This study examines the application of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) strategy in improving students' critical thinking skills when understanding texts. Critical thinking is essential for students to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information effectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating interactive reading strategies in educational practices to foster deeper comprehension and critical analysis in students of Akper Kesdam I/BB Padang. The method used in this study is classroom action research with a sample of 41 TK II students who are studying English for Nursing. The learning outcomes of students who obtained completeness in the pre-cycle or pre-test are still included in the category of less than good (very low) with an average value obtained of 56.80 or 24.39%. After conducting cycle I, there was an increase in the average value of 66.20 or 43.90% and after reflection continued to cycle II, the average value of students was 81.20 or 82.92%. It can be concluded that the implementation of the Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) strategy can improve the students critical thinking in reading. The implications of these findings suggest that educators should adopt the DRTA strategy to improve reading engagement and critical thinking in diverse learning contexts.
AlJanaydeh, K, & AlJamal, D (2021). Content Analysis of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Techniques in Action Pack 10 Student's Book. Al-Balqa Journal for Research and ajrs.ammanu.edu.jo, https://ajrs.ammanu.edu.jo/ojs/index.php/albalqajournal/article/view/120
Alshahrani, S. (2020). The Role of Collaborative Learning in Enhancing Students Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 456-467.dence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 95-104.
Anaktototy, K, & Lesnussa, I (2022). Improving EFL students' reading comprehension and critical thinking skill through directed reading thinking activity. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8258/c9b5ce87ef1659c8e3b92e3d6ebc64816835.pdf
Djamarah, S.B (2011). Psikologi Belajar. Edisi revisi . Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ehri, LC (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.334
Huang, Y., & Chang, C. (2019). The Impact of Constructivist Learning Environment on Students Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 100-115.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1995). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Production Unit.
Kucuk, S. (2017). The Effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity on Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking Skills of Students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 1-16.
Lusyani, F (2019). The Effect of Direct Reading Thinking Activity (Drta) On Students'reading Comprehension. Getsempena English Education Journal, ejournal.bbg.ac.id, https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/geej/article/view/865
Meesuk, P, Sramoon, B, & Wongrugsa, A (2020). Classroom action research-based instruction: The sustainable teacher professional development strategy. Journal of teacher Education for , sciendo.com, https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0008
Mustafa, M (2020). Scrutinizing Individual C-Trans Plus DRTA MethodTo Increase Student's Reading Comprehension. DEAS: Journal of Language Teaching and , repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id, https://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/4063/
Rahim, F. (2018). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Bumi Aksara
Smith, R, Snow, P, Serry, T, & Hammond, L (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, Taylor &Francis.

Please wait...
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.