.png)
This study investigates the relationship between empathy and the bystander effect among adolescents. The increasing prevalence of passive observer behavior, particularly in emergency or distressing situations involving youth, underscores the importance of examining psychological factors such as empathy. Using a quantitative correlational design, this study collected data from 320 adolescents aged 15–21 in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. Participants completed standardized Likert-scale questionnaires measuring empathy and bystander effect tendencies. The data were analyzed using simple linear regression. The findings reveal a significant negative correlation between empathy and the bystander effect. Specifically, higher levels of empathy are associated with a lower tendency to engage in passive bystander behavior. These results support theoretical perspectives that emphasize the emotional and cognitive dimensions of empathy as crucial mechanisms in promoting prosocial action. The study suggests that enhancing empathy through targeted interventions could reduce passive behaviors in emergency situations and promote greater social responsibility among adolescents. Beyond statistical findings, this study has clear implications for character education and school-based interventions. Educators can integrate empathy-building activities into the curriculum through narrative exercises, role-play, and collaborative discussions that help students articulate moral reasoning. Teachers play a vital role in reshaping discourse patterns by encouraging students to critically examine common justifications for inaction, such as “someone else will help” or “I didn’t want to stand out.” By fostering reflective language and scenario-based discussions, schools can cultivate not only emotional competence but also discursive awareness that promotes social responsibility and civic courage among youth.
Ai, Y., Ismail, R. Bin, & Chong, S. T. (2024). A Study of the Bystander Effect in Different Helping Situations. Social Psychology and Society, 15(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150108
Andrews, J. L., Foulkes, L. E., Bone, J. K., & Blakemore, S. J. (2020). Amplified concern for social risk in adolescence: development and validation of a new measure. Brain Sciences, 10(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10060397
Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Beyond self-serving bias: Diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw160
Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (Eds. . (2009). The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (2nd ed.). In Sage Publications.
Chávez, D. V., Palacios, D., Laninga-Wijnen, L., Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C. F., Berger, C., & Luengo Kanacri, B. P. (2024). Do Adolescents Adopt the Prosocial Behaviors of the Classmates They Like? A Social Network Analysis on Prosocial Contagion. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z
Conroy, R. M. (2018). The RCSI Sample Size Handbook. Research Gate, May, 1–79. https://www.beaumontethics.ie/docs/application/samplesize2021.pdf
Darley, J., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4 PART 1), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
Davis, M. H. (2015). Measuring individual differences in empathy : Evidence for a multidimensional approach. January 1983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Deng, X., Yang, J., & Wu, Y. (2021). Adolescent Empathy Influences Bystander Defending in School Bullying: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690898
Eijigu, T. D., & Teketel, S. Z. (2021). Bullying in schools: prevalence, bystanders’ reaction and associations with sex and relationships. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00685-5
Fadhilah, I. N. (2022). The Relationship Between The Bystander Effect and Prososial Behavior in Students Of The Faculty Of Psychology And Educational Sciences At University. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.7.2022.5196
Falla, D., Romera, E. M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2021). Aggression, Moral Disengagement and Empathy. A Longitudinal Study Within the Interpersonal Dynamics of Bullying. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703468
Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., & Samuelsson, M. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: Fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Paper in Education, 29(5), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.878375
Fredrick, S. S., Jenkins, L. N., & Ray, K. (2020). Dimensions of empathy and bystander intervention in bullying in elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 79(April), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.03.001
Gönültaş, S., Ketzitzidou Argyri, E., Yüksel, A. Ş., & Rutland, A. (2024). Peer group norms affect adolescents’ bystander social cognitions. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000731
Hikmat, R., Suryani, S., Yosep, I., & Jeharsae, R. (2024). Empathy’s Crucial Role: Unraveling Impact on Students Bullying Behavior - A Scoping Review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17(July), 3483–3495. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S469921
Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2018). From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417749653
Hu, Y., Zhang, T., Shi, H. F., & Fan, C. Y. (2023). Empathy and bystander helping behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents: the mediating role of internet moral judgment and the moderating role of internet self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(September), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196571
Ishtiyaq, S., Tyagi, S., Pandey, A. S., Kumari, J., Srivastava, H. K., & Chauhan, R. (2024). Relationship Between Empathy and Prosocial Behavior. 6(6), 1–11.
Jamain, R. R., Yulius, H., & Putro, S. (2025). Pengaruh Sikap Empati dan Bystander Effect terhadap Perilaku Bullying Siswa di SMA. 0738(2), 375–385.
Lyons, M., Brewer, G., Bogle, I., Castro Caicedo, J., Gaspar, M., Ghayda, C., Huelin, M., Wei Liang, T., & Centifanti, L. (2022). Barriers to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment: The Dark Triad and Rape Myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP22151–NP22174. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211072150
Mainwaring, C., Gabbert, F., & Scott, A. J. (2023). A Systematic Review Exploring Variables Related to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Violence Contexts. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 24(3), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221079660
Mesurado, B., Distefano, M. J., Robiolo, G., & Richaud, M. C. (2019). The Hero program: Development and initial validation of an intervention program to promote prosocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2566–2584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518793224
MICHA, R. (2017). 乳鼠心肌提取 HHS Public Access. Physiology & Behavior, 176(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146515594631.Marriage
Mu, X., Wang, Q., Wu, N., & Liu, S. (2025). The influence of empathy on the interpersonal emotion regulation strategies of adolescents. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00802-z
Mulvey, K. L., Gönültaş, S., Irdam, G., Carlson, R. G., DiStefano, C., & Irvin, M. J. (2021). School and Teacher Factors That Promote Adolescents’ Bystander Responses to Social Exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581089
Palacio, A. S. G. T. and N. M. D. (2020). The Protective Role of Empathy and Emotional Self-efficacy in Predicting Moral Disengagement in Adolescents Separated from Illegal Armed Groups. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2021a10
Pang, Y. L., Song, C., & Ma, C. (2022). Effect of Different Types of Empathy on Prosocial Behavior: Gratitude as Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.768827
Putri, A. P., Maulia, D., & Lestari, F. W. (2024). Perbedaan Pengaruh Empati Terhadap Perilaku Bystander Bullying Pada Siswa di Indonesia dan Malaysia. 8(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.823197
Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Rahmat, W., & Lateh, N. H. M. (2024). A stylistic pragmatics perspective on metaphors of emotive words in Anak Bajang Menggiring Angin. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(8), 2417–2425. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.1
Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Saddhono, K., Septia, E., Hartati, Y. S., Nisja, I., ... & Mana, L. H. A. (2023). BIPA learning practices of international students in higher education: A phenomenon of language integration based on psychopragmatics approach. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8), 2733
Sahi, R. S., Eisenberger, N. I., & Silvers, J. A. (2023). Peer facilitation of emotion regulation in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 62(June), 101262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101262
Sanderson, C. . (2020). The bystander effect: The psychology of courage and how to be brave.
Schroeder, D. A., Graziano, W. G., Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2014). The Empathy–Altruism Hypothesis. The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, December. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023
Shukla, S., Mishra, S. K., & Agustino, R. D. (2022). Reflection of Types of Prosocial Behavior During COVID-19 in Collectivistic Asian Countries—India and Indonesia. Qualitative Health Research, 32(13), 1993–2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221129260
Slote, M. (2007). the Ethics of Care and Empathy. In The Ethics Of Care And Empathy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945735
Steinvik, H. R., Duffy, A. L., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2025). Adolescents’ Compassion is Distinctively Associated With More Prosocial and Less Aggressive Defending Against Bullying When Considering Empathic Emotions and Costs. Journal of Adolescence, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12513
Syaf, A., Ramadhani, R., & Putra, A. A. (2023). Benarkah Empati dapat menurunkan Bystander Effect Pada Remaja? Psychopolytan : Jurnal Psikologi, 7(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.36341/psi.v7i1.3888
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive Questions in Surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
Tsagris, M., & Pandis, N. (2021). Normality test: Is it really necessary? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 159(4), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.003
Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A. G., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 18(9), 1–14.
Wolgast, A., Donat, M., Liesen, J., & Rüprich, C. (2023). Perspective-taking and belief in a just world matter: Adolescents’ role experiences in bullying processes. Current Psychology, 42(31), 27372–27387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03816-2
Xiao, W., Lin, X., Li, X., Xu, X., Guo, H., Sun, B., & Jiang, H. (2021). The Influence of Emotion and Empathy on Decisions to Help Others. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211014513
Yoon, G. S., Kim, Y. H., & Lim, S. J. (2012). Division Technique Training Tool for Problem Solving Methods of IPR. Creative Education, 03(08), 1404–1408. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38205
Zhang, B., Liang, S., Chen, J., Chen, L., Chen, W., Tu, S., Hu, L., Jin, H., & Chu, L. (2022). Effectiveness of peer-mediated intervention on social skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Translational Pediatrics, 11(5), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-110
Subjek (en_US)
Bahasa
Halaman
Volume
Edisi
Tanggal Terbit
Tanggal Submit
Tanggal Diterbitkan
Tanggal Modifikasi
Jurnal
URI Jurnal
Hak Cipta
Jenis Artikel
ID (DOI)
Please wait...
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
