STUDENT SPEAKING ACTIONS IN UNDERSTANDING THE MEANING OF ENGLISH COMMUNICATION HOMOPONS IN THE LECTURE ROOM

Delpa Delpa , Putri Dian Afrinda
The meaning of homophones is a part of the vocabulary that is difficult to understand because the sound when the pronunciation is the same but the meaning is different. For example, the words to, two and too spoken by English users will sound the same. This causes missinterpretation in giving meaning. Along with that, basically advances in communication technology have made it easier for students to learn English related to the meaning of the homophone. Students can also learn this through various applications such as Facebook, Snack Video, Tik Tok as a teaching resource in exploring the meaning of homophones in English. In addition, students can also communicate in English with various countries based on this communication technology. The problem is that although advances in communication technology have provided space and opportunities for students to master English related to the meaning of homophones, there are still many students who do not understand the use of the meaning of homophones in English. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which students understand the meaning of the use of homophone words such as to, two and too to students in the lecture room. This research consists of three study rules. First, the rule of study uses the rules of a questionnaire to 500 students from various universities. Apart from that, the reviewer also used the rules of in-depth interview (In-Depth Interview) to 5 informants. The analysis of the study uses quantitative and qualitative rules where the reviewer will emphasize student speech and explanations supported by information from study informants. The objective of research about ability of the student university level how to read and heard the homophone word by the lecturer. From the analysis of the data, it can be concluded that the students easily understanding read the homophone and difficult the homophone, like to, two and too. The rule family institution teaching homophone English language to their children can improve about English language ability especially understanding homophone, like to, two and too. Besides that, communication technology can help the student learning English language about homophone.    

Chaer, Abdul. 2003. Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Etikasari, Dian. 2012. Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Wacana Kelas (Kajian Mikroetnografi Terhadap Bahasa Guru. Universitas Negeri Malang. Diunduh tanggal 25 Maret 2016.

Desyati. 2004. “Analisis Tindak Tutur Wacana Jual Beli di Pasar Kadipolo Surakarta (Sebuah Kajian Pragmatik). Skripsi Thesis. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press, Cambridge.

Idrus, M. 2009. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Isah Cahyani, Daris Hadianto. 2018. Rekonstruksionisme Metode Komunikatif dalam Pemerolehan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Jurnal Kata. 2 (1) 118-123.

Koentjaraningrat. 2003. Pengantar Antropologi I. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Kusuma, Adriyani. 2016. Motivasi dan Sikap Bahasa Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undhiksa. Bali: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. 5 (1) 749-763.

Mahsun. 2012. Metode Penelitian Bahasa (edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, Lexy. J. 2010 Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Masril, M. 2018. JURNAL SIMBOLIKA Research and Learning in Comunication Study Pola Komunikasi Remaja di Era Digital Adolescent Communication Pattern in Digital Era. 4(2), 188–199.

Putri, Febrina Riska. 2012. Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMA Negeri 15 Padang. Universitas Negeri Padang. Diunduh tanggal 25 Maret 2016.

Rahmawati, A., Hafidah, R., & Syamsuddin, M. M. 2016. Peningkatan Ketrampilan Stimulasi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini melalui Parent Class.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2010. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rohmadi, Muhammad. 2010. Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Moleong, Lexy.J. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosada Karya.

Sri Handayani, 2016. Pentingnya Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Dalam Menyongsong ASEAN Community. Surakarta: Jurnal ISPI. 3 (1) 102-106.

Sulasman dan Setia Gumilar. 2013. Teori-teori Kebudayaan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 2009. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka


Please wait...

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research (JPDR) is indexed at:
 
Visitor Statistics: Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research
 
Publisher:
Pusat Kajian Bahasa, Komunikasi dan Pengkajian Budaya
Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya (PPJBSIP).
Apartemen Suite Metro, Jalan Soekarno Hatta No. 698B, Kelurahan Jatisari - Kecamatan Buahbatu Bandung, Jawa Barat 40286.
 

About the JournalJournal PoliciesAuthorInformation