Exploring Digital Discourtesy: Impoliteness Strategies In K-Drama Fan Discourse on Social Media

Agus Darma Yoga Pratama , Putu Vania Maharani Suastha
This study analyzes impoliteness strategies used by netizens in responses to the variety show "Single Inferno 3" on the X app, specifically through the K-Drama Menfess account. Menfess, short for "Mention and Confess," is a term in K-Pop and K-Drama culture, describing messages sent via direct message to auto-bot accounts on platforms like Twitter, where users share opinions on specific topics. "Single Inferno 3" is a popular show among K-Drama fans, and the comments in the Menfess account's replies provide insights into how impoliteness emerges in reactions to South Korean entertainment. Using a descriptive qualitative method, this study examines the types of impoliteness in netizen comments related to the show, drawing on Culpeper's (2011) theory of language impoliteness. The data, collected from comments posted on January 3rd, 2024, reveals that sarcasm or mock politeness is the most prevalent strategy, appearing in 45.45% of cases. Positive impoliteness accounts for 27.27%, negative impoliteness for 18.18%, and bald on-record impoliteness for 9.09%, with no instances of withheld politeness. Sarcasm often involves indirect insults, while negative impoliteness includes belittling remarks. These impoliteness strategies typically arise in contexts where netizens scrutinize the show's participants, reacting to behavior that deviates from expected norms. The study's findings can help social media platforms develop tools to detect and reduce impolite interactions, such as automated moderation systems and user guidelines to promote respectful online discourse.

Alias, A., & Yahaya, M. (2019). Impoliteness Strategies used by Malaysian Netizens in Response to the Music Videos of Drag Queens. International Journal of Social Science Research, 44-58.

Andersson, M. (2021). The Climate of Climate Change: Impoliteness as A Hallmark of Homophly in YouTube Comment threads on Greta Thunberg's Environmental Activism. Journal of Pragmatics, 93-107.

Anurudu, S., & Ochuko, G. (2020). Impoliteness and Computer-Mediated Discourse. Humanities and social sciences.

Azka, M., Purwanto, B., & Triana, L. (22). Gaya Ironi dan Sarkasme di Kolom Komentar Akun Instagram Tempodotco dan Implikasinya terhadap Pembelejaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra,d an Pengajaran, 160-168.

Cahyanti, A. (2020). Analisis Penggunaan Kalimat Sarkasme oleh Netizen di Media Sosial Instagram. Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 186-195. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 349-367.

Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and Entertainmanet in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 35-72.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J., & Tantucci, V. (2021). The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity . Jounal of Pragmatics. 146-164.

Colaco, L., Vijayarajoo, A. R., & Lin, T. M. (2021). The Use of Impoliteness Strategies in Online Feedback Relating to A General Election in Media. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.

Edwards, L., Kontostathis, A. E., & Fisher, C. (2016). Cyberbullying, Race/Ethnicity and Mental Health Outcomes: A Review of The Literature. Journal Media and Communication , 71-78.

Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Negative Impoliteness and Reconstruction of Identity: Cyberpragmatics Analysis of Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Arab YoTube Channel. Jurnal Arbiter, 168-179.

Fitriyah, M. N., & Yuniseffendi, M. (2021). Bahasa Sarkaseme Warganet dalam Komentar akun Instagram Puan Maharani DPR RI. Bapala, 112-119.

Graham, S. L. (2007a). 'Do Unto Others': Gender and the Construction of a 'Good Christian' Identity in e-Community. Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse (pp. 73--103). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Graham, S. L., & Hardaker, C. (2017). (Im)politeness in Digital Communication. The Palgrave Handbook of (Im)politeness, 785-814. Grice, H. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Khazraie, M., & Talebzadeh, H. (2020). “Wikipedia does NOT tolerate your babbling!”: Impoliteness-induced conflict (resolution) in a polylogal collaborative online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nafiah.Hidayatun.(2023).Impoliteness Strategies In The Hate Comments Of Youtube Video: “The Little Mermaid Teaser Trailer”. Malang.

Novalia, A., & Ambalegin, A. (2021). Impoliteness Found in Deddy Corbuzier's Podcast on YouTube. E-Journal of Linguistics, 136-144.

Pratama, H. (2021). Sarcasm as Impoliteness Device in Indonesian and American Context. English Language Teaching, LIterature, and Translation (ELTLT), 38-42

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Würtz, E. (2005). Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(1), 274–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1083- 6101.2006.TB00313.X


Please wait...

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research (JPDR) is indexed at:
 
Visitor Statistics: Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research
 
Publisher:
Pusat Kajian Bahasa, Komunikasi dan Pengkajian Budaya
Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya (PPJBSIP).
Apartemen Suite Metro, Jalan Soekarno Hatta No. 698B, Kelurahan Jatisari - Kecamatan Buahbatu Bandung, Jawa Barat 40286.
 

About the JournalJournal PoliciesAuthorInformation